Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4500 8,800 User benchmarks, average bench 34% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Memory 75.4 1-Core 28.9 2-Core 53.7 38% 52.7 Pts	4-Core 24.2 8-Core 56.9 5% 40.6 Pts	64-Core 51.2 3% 51.2 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 048A) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.3% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.36 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.39 0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.3% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 155 128 144 141 157 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.6% Below average	Read 189 Write 158 Mixed 166 SusWrite 149 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 9.2 37% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 99 DQ Write 67.4 DQ Mixed 70.6 56% 79 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 89.5 45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium T4500IntelBench 34%, 8,800 samples	34x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	29x
de jeu de puces Express Mobile Intel 45FamilleBench 0%, 284 samples	1x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16