TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Notebook W65_67SF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook W65_67SF  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SF
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140825
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 11:05
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4210M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 60
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 100
45% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 140
19% 138 Pts
64-Core 150
10% 150 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 41.7%
 Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6502) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4416
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 15.5
3% 17.3 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 16.2
2% 11.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.28%
 Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 256GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0213E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 140 129 139 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 380
Write 140
Mixed 156
SusWrite 133
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 3.7
35% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 56.4
61% 102 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 38.6%
 Great: 105%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$42
165GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 210
Write 185
Mixed 202
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 29.2
94% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 189
142% 188 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 125%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 32.1%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical W65_67SF Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SF

CPU
Core i7-4710MQIntel  $153Bench 67%, 18,270 samples28x
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 56%, 11,511 samples14x
Core i7-4700MQIntel  $209Bench 67%, 40,858 samples11x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 225,215 samples54x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 15,804 samples22x
SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 46%, 41,121 samples4x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston  $47Bench 65%, 57,508 samples3x
M550 mSATA 512GBCrucial  $458Bench 88%, 376 samples3x
RAM
Team-Elite-1600 2x4GBTeamBench 52%, 3,405 samples11x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 23,789 samples7x
99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 26%, 4,606 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $153
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $142Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $42
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback