Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateSep 26 '19 at 14:51
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 120
53% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 325
31% 256 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3827 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 143
Parallax 175
99% 146 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 142
Splatting 105
113% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 104 104 100 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 460
Write 424
Mixed 298
SusWrite 126
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 40.4
138% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 148
139% 217 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
502GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 138 139 141 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 170
Write 155
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 139
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 191 191 191 189 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 164
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 191
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
391% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 11.3
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 39%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback