Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 112% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING (all builds)
Memory	121.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '16 at 18:29
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 131 2-Core 262 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 523 8-Core 835 83% 679 Pts	64-Core 1,033 64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7570 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 147 Parallax 142 126% 148 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 139 Splatting 109 98% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 15 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 52 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 68 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8671700	116% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 415 Mixed 422 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 99 4K Mixed 46.7 184% 64.3 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 76.9 123% 239 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 233GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 64 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 56 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 65 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 160852776	107% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 416 Mixed 422 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 95.7 4K Mixed 44.4 177% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 46.1 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 25.8 60% 116 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 124%
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-00000 128GB 2,105 User benchmarks, average bench 180% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7300Q Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 1,776 Write 592 Mixed 859 235% 1,076 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 29 200% 81.1 MB/s	DQ Read 50.9 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 29.8 45% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 214%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB 850 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 146 7400 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2807 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11581 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 148 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 57 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 185 185 47251 (C2) HDA temperature 122 93 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.2% Good	Read 118 Write 120 Mixed 117 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.23 104% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 68%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB 850 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 140 7666 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2749 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11510 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 161 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10212 (C2) HDA temperature 123 96 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59.2% Above average	Read 99.9 Write 106 Mixed 99.2 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.22 97% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 68%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB 850 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 144 7533 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2248 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10610 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 160 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 60 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 184 184 49427 (C2) HDA temperature 124 99 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.9% Very good	Read 127 Write 124 Mixed 115 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3 (03) Spinup time 122 104 6891 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 114 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17744 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 106 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 65 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 107 107 281699 (C2) HDA temperature 117 92 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 95.7 Mixed 88.3 70% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.36 97% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 199 183 6033 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2003 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11440 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 69 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10557 (C2) HDA temperature 119 90 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.6% Above average	Read 98.7 Write 98.4 Mixed 93.5 73% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.43 101% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 8x16GB 328 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	MC Read 52.2 MC Write 64.6 MC Mixed 55.1 164% 57.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 24.3 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 177%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 1,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	522x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	256x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	242x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	282x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	173x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	154x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	41x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	41x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	20x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 3,272 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $912

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16