Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	15.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq nx7400 (EY294ET#ABH) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30A2
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '19 at 22:03
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel T2300 946 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 37.3 1-Core 12.1 2-Core 19.1 17% 22.8 Pts	4-Core 25 8-Core 25.9 3% 25.5 Pts	64-Core 23.9 2% 23.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 35%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 45 42 42 43 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.2% Very poor	Read 63.5 Write 38.8 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 43.8 11% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 4.8 21% 7.3 MB/s	DQ Read 94.1 DQ Write 69.1 DQ Mixed 37.9 40% 67 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.82% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 2 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.82% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16