Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '19 at 17:58
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6850K-$400
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70.4% Very good
1-Core 103
2-Core 208
73% 155 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 702
69% 548 Pts
64-Core 889
60% 889 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
EVGA(3842 2744) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
8.59% Terrible
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 28.2
6% 24.6 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 24.7
9% 24.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 366 364 355 359 350 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 391
Write 426
Mixed 359
SusWrite 360
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 34.8
126% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 338
253% 337 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$319
353GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 372 373 373 372 374 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 438
Mixed 389
SusWrite 373
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 51.2
172% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
192GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 241 254 254 254 255 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 408
Write 250
Mixed 258
SusWrite 251
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 14
93% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 23.8
45% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$40
181GB free
Firmware: CC2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 112 118 116 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 89.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 116
62% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 65%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
160GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 40
Mixed 34
SusWrite 41.5
53% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 50.2
MC Mixed 40.6
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $2,098
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback