Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '19 at 16:29
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 78.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 221
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 774
75% 616 Pts
64-Core 765
47% 765 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 191
Parallax 191
142% 185 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 172
Splatting 125
114% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
120GB free
Firmware: X35510RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 387 412 298 221 223 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 476
Write 431
Mixed 304
SusWrite 318
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 28.5
96% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 184
164% 252 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81%
Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
148GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 417 455 327 151 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 470
Mixed 445
SusWrite 308
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 40.5
143% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 344
252% 332 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 133%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1813 1401 1394 1317 987 488 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,807
Write 2,021
Mixed 1695
SusWrite 1,233
381% 1,689 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 58.3
192% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 688
508% 670 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 237%
Great: 335%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
82GB free
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,963
Write 1,435
Mixed 705
301% 1,368 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.7
193% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 725
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 686
512% 682 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 306%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 92 95 91 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 110
Write 85.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 92.6
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 29.8
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,050
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback