Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '19 at 16:29
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$378
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
78.4% Very good
1-Core 121
2-Core 256
88% 189 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 738
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 692
46% 692 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 523
Reflection 498
Parallax 610
137% 544 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 517
Splatting 286
134% 354 fps
Poor: 119%
This bench: 134%
Great: 146%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$134
120GB free
Firmware: X35510RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 387 412 298 221 223 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 476
Write 431
Mixed 304
SusWrite 318
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 28.5
96% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 184
164% 252 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81%
Great: 104%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$319
148GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 417 455 327 151 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 470
Mixed 445
SusWrite 308
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 40.5
143% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 344
252% 332 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 135%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$190
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1813 1401 1394 1317 987 488 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,807
Write 2,021
Mixed 1695
SusWrite 1,233
381% 1,689 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 58.3
192% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 688
508% 670 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 237%
Great: 307%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
82GB free
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,963
Write 1,435
Mixed 705
301% 1,368 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.7
193% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 725
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 686
512% 682 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 316%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 92 95 91 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 110
Write 85.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 92.6
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 29.8
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 172%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $1,589
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback