Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory51.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '19 at 16:05
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$378
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
97% 206 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 715
75% 585 Pts
64-Core 720
48% 720 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 526
Reflection 511
Parallax 562
138% 533 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 519
Splatting 288
135% 356 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 134%
Great: 147%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$134
120GB free
Firmware: X35510RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 224 222 214 210 210 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 326
Write 365
Mixed 230
SusWrite 227
65% 287 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 21.7
102% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 50.1
101% 209 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70%
Great: 104%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$318
148GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 448 289 166 121 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 460
Mixed 437
SusWrite 259
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 49.8
163% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 347
265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 135%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$190
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1627 979 754 963 1007 784 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,871
Write 2,097
Mixed 1726
SusWrite 1,019
378% 1,678 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 59.2
197% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 611
DQ Mixed 709
523% 690 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 229%
Great: 307%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
82GB free
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,006
Write 1,460
Mixed 606
298% 1,357 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 61.1
208% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 696
524% 701 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 316%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 98 91 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 95.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 92
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 29.2
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 30.6
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94%
Great: 172%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $1,589
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback