Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime12.6 Days
Run DateSep 24 '19 at 10:16
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 693
71% 574 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 66
Parallax 76.2
49% 67.5 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 58.4
Splatting 55.4
49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 109 117 121 130 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 461
Mixed 336
SusWrite 136
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 55.8
191% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 330
260% 360 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
183GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 73 70 73 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 80.2
Write 75
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 71.8
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB
314GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 82 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 81.5
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.3
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $476
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback