Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 153% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 175% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '19 at 09:48
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Memory 80.8 1-Core 150 2-Core 301 95% 177 Pts	4-Core 599 8-Core 1,189 106% 894 Pts	64-Core 2,177 135% 2,177 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	159% Outstanding	Lighting 219 Reflection 220 Parallax 235 179% 225 fps	MRender 257 Gravity 217 Splatting 146 162% 207 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 14,022 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57HA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 271 288 284 470 537 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,500 Write 206 Mixed 998 SusWrite 383 170% 772 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 54.9 222% 85.5 MB/s	DQ Read 829 DQ Write 791 DQ Mixed 782 595% 801 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 235%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 44GB free Firmware: 5.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 117 114 122 112 108 MB/s Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	74.4% Very good	Read 244 Write 216 Mixed 221 SusWrite 119 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 93.3 4K Mixed 43 158% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 130 115% 173 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 83%
Liteonit LAT-256M2S 256GB 534 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 67GB free Firmware: PNDA SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 289 281 283 251 240 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 376 Write 293 Mixed 262 SusWrite 272 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 19.8 72% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 70.7 DQ Write 44.9 DQ Mixed 48.2 38% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 56%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 920GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 106 111 112 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 94.5 Write 89 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 110 67% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 902GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 116 119 119 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 135 Write 141 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 118 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMR16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMR16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 45.1 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 40.1 119% 41.7 GB/s	SC Read 26.2 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 36.3 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)