Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 218 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 632 61% 501 Pts	64-Core 893 55% 893 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.11 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 7.04 Parallax 7.72 5% 7 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 7.17 Splatting 7.17 5% 6.15 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB 14,337 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: UK500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 57 45 13 3.5 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 360 Write 146 Mixed 252 SusWrite 42.4 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 16.4 50% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 42.5 DQ Write 24.1 DQ Mixed 41.9 29% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 28.7 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 24.3 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	291x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $322

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16