Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 207 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 543 55% 446 Pts	64-Core 540 33% 540 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 354.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 10.4 12% 13.2 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 11.9 Splatting 15.4 11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 11%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 480GB-$301 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC32 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 339 Write 220 Mixed 278 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 15.2 55% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 89.5 DQ Mixed 85.8 57% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC62 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 198 Write 93.5 Mixed 62.2 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2.5 424% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 4x8GB 782 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	87.5% Excellent	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 40.3 MC Mixed 30.9 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 19.4 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16