PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140911 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Sep 24 '19 at 01:19 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | MEX-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.5%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
24.2%
Poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 56 59 92 89 69 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
52GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 57 60 92 89 70 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
40GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 102 98 103 97 100 MB/s
|
78.8%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
70GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 102 98 103 97 100 MB/s
|
87.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 52x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 30x |
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 25x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 15x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $275 |