Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Memory 39.6 1-Core 39.4 2-Core 76.2 31% 51.7 Pts	4-Core 74.8 8-Core 75.5 10% 75.2 Pts	64-Core 73.3 4% 73.3 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.48% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.42 Parallax 0.12 2% 1.48 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 1.87 1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.48% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 119GB 1,052 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 107GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 210 63 72 73 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 380 Write 105 Mixed 288 SusWrite 124 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 22.7 83% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 102 78% 106 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1GB 341 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 0.8 4% 1.33 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16