Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 7810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 7810 (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170726
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '19 at 21:25
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 63.6 2-Core 151 52% 92.4 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 473 47% 384 Pts	64-Core 1,090 68% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 34.6 Reflection 33.4 Parallax 32.6 28% 33.5 fps	MRender 44.7 Gravity 33.4 Splatting 35.5 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 929 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Dell(1028 0B0D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1201 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.12.1 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 16.7 Reflection 21.1 Parallax 19.4 14% 19.1 fps	MRender 21.7 Gravity 16.8 Splatting 23.2 17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB 4,915 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10E SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 302 323 360 337 355 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 406 Write 352 Mixed 292 SusWrite 336 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 30.3 110% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 32.5 80% 162 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 803GB free Firmware: ABX0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 147 148 147 151 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 149 Write 144 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 148 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451R7AFR8N-TF 4x4GB 395 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.1% Above average	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 18 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.4 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	143x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	88x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	137x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	121x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	80x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	39x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	31x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	27x

RAM
HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 95%, 876 samples	82x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	62x
M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 963 samples	46x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16