Trigem DREAMSYS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemTrigem DREAMSYS  (all builds)
MotherboardTriGem DREAMSYS
Memory1.6 GB free of 3.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '19 at 13:39
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 30.1
2-Core 55.7
36% 52 Pts
4-Core 55
8-Core 51.7
7% 53.3 Pts
64-Core 56.7
4% 56.7 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Lighting 8.73
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 10.2
7% 8.91 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 7.17
7% 8.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hkvsn HS-SSD-C100/120G 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C03150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 117 117 63 54 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.8% Below average
Read 162
Write 223
Mixed 185
SusWrite 79.7
37% 162 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 19.3
83% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 72.4
DQ Mixed 21.8
25% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 79%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
84GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 38 43 38 42 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
27% Poor
Read 55.1
Write 52.9
Mixed 39
SusWrite 38.4
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27%
Great: 35%
USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.3 9.8 10 9.2 8.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 9
11% 9.38 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 512, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DREAMSYS Builds (Compare 767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Trigem DREAMSYS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback