Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660 2,343 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 142 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 591 51% 437 Pts	64-Core 842 52% 842 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000 1,288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% HP(103C 076F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 5.2GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	13% Very poor	Lighting 18.2 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 20.1 15% 21.3 fps	MRender 26 Gravity 14.6 Splatting 0.04 10% 13.6 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 80 65 89 99 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 117 Write 116 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 90.2 72% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 69%
Hitachi HUS156030VLS600 300GB 589 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 278GB free Firmware: HPH1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 194 195 195 190 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 191 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 192 122% 166 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.6 295% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 107%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 0015 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 10 10 10 9.9 10 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	5.84% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 8.2 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 10.2 12% 9.77 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.84% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 82GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 21 60% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 9.9 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	187x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16