Gigabyte GA-X48-DQ6

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X48-DQ6 (all builds)
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080229
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '19 at 22:40
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110 5,335 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	48% Average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 37.7 2-Core 56.9 39% 55.6 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 155 19% 146 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5870 10,176 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E140) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Lighting 28.3 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 26.2 23% 23.3 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 19.7 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 138 192 195 194 197 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.3% Average	Read 237 Write 200 Mixed 146 SusWrite 182 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 20.7 78% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.7 DQ Write 57.1 DQ Mixed 23.9 23% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 76%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 464GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 69 76 77 77 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 74.6 Write 54.5 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 75.2 46% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 43%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 221GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 55 56 56 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 65 Write 60.5 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 55.9 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	21.1% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X48-DQ6 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X48-DQ6

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	7x
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	4x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	2x

SSD
SU635 240GBAdata $20Bench 68%, 12,702 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
X110 128GBSanDisk $89Bench 71%, 11,245 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	27x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	11x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $181

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16