Lenovo 80EC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80EC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B3
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 20:21
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 35.5
2-Core 65.5
33% 50.2 Pts
4-Core 78.1
8-Core 68.9
10% 73.5 Pts
64-Core 83.8
6% 83.8 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 41%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
909GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 41 42 76 68 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 43.1
Write 44.7
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 56.1
28% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
81% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Ramaxel RMT3170ME68F9F1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 9.7
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.1
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22%
Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 80EC Builds (Compare 2,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 80EC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $32
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback