Medionpc MS-7255

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMedionpc MS-7255  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7255
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060919
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 6400
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 64.7
23% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 63.7
8-Core 59.2
8% 61.5 Pts
64-Core 62.4
4% 62.4 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 12%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3545) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 2.3
2% 5.9 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 5.1
2% 6.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0330AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 77 86 87 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 123
Write 114
Mixed 120
SusWrite 75.7
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 27.2
87% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 39
32% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 39%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 60 67 68 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 87.3
Write 93.9
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 66.2
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 115%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$74
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 66 70 75 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48% Average
Read 95.8
Write 87.9
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 71.3
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MS-7255 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7255

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $70
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback