HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F7
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 15:04
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
27.8% Poor
1-Core 43
2-Core 85.6
30% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 156
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 152
10% 152 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 82F7) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 29.7
4% 15.4 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 15.4
6% 16.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 59 55 52 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 57.2
61% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20%
Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 22,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback