| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 7.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140721 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 22 '19 at 13:45 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57%
Above average
|
67% 111 Pts
|
19% 142 Pts
|
9% 146 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Asus(1043 84EA) 2GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.30
|
7.84%
Terrible
|
7% 9.05 fps
|
9% 10.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
679GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 129 151 145 149 176 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
74% 102 MB/s
|
101% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 15 12 8.8 8.7 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
20% 16.1 MB/s
|
155% 2.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.9%
Average
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
60% 66.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,318 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 331x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 265x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 188x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 441x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 144x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 112x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $227 |