PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q DELUXE (all builds) |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090710 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 22 '19 at 13:30 |
Run Duration | 194 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
63.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86
|
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 152 201 258 273 268 MB/s
|
81.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
103GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 156 140 78 69 75 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
7GB free, PID 6364
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.3 12 8.1 11 9.5 MB/s
|
6.66%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 16GB
7GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.4 11 9.7 11 9.6 MB/s
|
21.5%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
67GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 22 23 27 15 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 71x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 20x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 11x |
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 40% - Below average | Total price: $459 |