Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 13:19
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 109
55% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 293
30% 244 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8460) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 0.62
2% 1.98 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 419 411 418 411 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 427
Mixed 366
SusWrite 416
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 47.9
166% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 255
191% 254 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 194 190 191 191 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 156
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 192
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
289GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 102 104 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 103
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 13
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback