ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion ERAZER X5390 F/C145

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X5390 F/C145 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160125
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '19 at 11:59
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 87.8 1-Core 125 2-Core 222 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 692 67% 549 Pts	64-Core 691 43% 691 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.5% Very good	Lighting 101 Reflection 108 Parallax 96.8 82% 102 fps	MRender 86.8 Gravity 94.1 Splatting 83.7 72% 88.2 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GB 467 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 236 222 221 202 198 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 311 Mixed 238 SusWrite 215 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 98.4 4K Mixed 37.3 148% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 267 211% 295 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 119%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 142 144 144 143 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 158 Write 134 Mixed 75 SusWrite 143 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299 20,912 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.7% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 13.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback