TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Alienware m17 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware m17 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware m17 R2
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190523
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 05:22
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 896
89% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,360
84% 1,360 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 99%
 Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 093C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7063
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 131
Parallax 8.66
6% 48.7 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 7.47
Splatting 16.7
11% 12.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 7.23%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10604105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1708 776 789 791 792 784 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,746
Write 2,039
Mixed 1,464
SusWrite 940
348% 1,547 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 76.3
262% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 905
699% 950 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑
This bench: 252%
 Great: 267%
TOSHIBA silicon-power 3GB
3GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.5 3.2 3.3 2.9 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.59% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 9.3
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 2.9
11% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 1.73 MB/s
TOSHIBA silicon-power 5GB
1GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 9.7
Write 1
SusWrite 0.4
3% 3.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 27
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 56.4
71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 80.6%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical m17 R2 Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware m17 R2

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples190x
Core i9-9980HKIntelBench 82%, 8,965 samples20x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples3x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples124x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples42x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples28x
SSD
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 242%, 17,176 samples30x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc601Bench 162%, 6,475 samples23x
NVMe Samsung 512GBPm981aBench 220%, 3,592 samples11x
RAM
4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 75%, 6,362 samples104x
HMAA1GS6CMR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 6,382 samples94x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback