HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81E5
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160421
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 22:45
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 44.7
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 54.5
27% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 106
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 81E5) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.2301.1002
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 2.84
2% 3.19 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BHT WR202HH032G E70215F5 31GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 150100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 14 15 15 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 114
Write 18
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 15.4
10% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 5.7
22% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback