Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 21:28
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 131
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 387
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.7% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 141
Parallax 133
95% 130 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 132
Splatting 104
94% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 126 86 75 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 301
Write 125
Mixed 167
SusWrite 94.9
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 28.4
107% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 127
98% 134 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
47GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 279 314 305 319 319 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 368
Mixed 342
SusWrite 301
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 47.1
154% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 211
158% 210 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
80GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 91 86 91 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 145
Write 150
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 88.7
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 189 193 184 194 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 157
Mixed 88
SusWrite 189
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback