Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '19 at 19:48
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Memory 96.1 1-Core 132 2-Core 264 92% 164 Pts	4-Core 522 8-Core 623 74% 572 Pts	64-Core 664 41% 664 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.2% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 100 Parallax 98.9 84% 101 fps	MRender 143 Gravity 101 Splatting 86 87% 110 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 240GB 5,326 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1001A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 26 22 28 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 498 Write 37 Mixed 57 SusWrite 24.3 33% 154 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 32.3 DQ Write 25.4 DQ Mixed 4.5 10% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 119%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 304GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 444 451 453 388 390 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 457 Mixed 435 SusWrite 428 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 51 181% 64.2 MB/s	DQ Read 41.1 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 62.4 55% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 123 123 122 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Read 157 Write 144 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 122 83% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 3,287 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 28.1 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 24.7 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 53.7 75% 53.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	105x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	99x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	93x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	92x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $853

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16