Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 18:53
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-8600K-$258
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
1-Core 107
2-Core 217
76% 162 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 637
69% 534 Pts
64-Core 632
42% 632 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$799
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 497
Reflection 482
Parallax 581
132% 520 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 488
Splatting 277
114% 338 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 124%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
R5SL240G 240GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0811B
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 434
Write 359
Mixed 375
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 31.2
127% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 45.9
88% 181 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 103%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$110
103GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 223 200 130 112 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 356
Write 374
Mixed 295
SusWrite 174
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 36.9
130% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 160
141% 211 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 92%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$70
832GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 107
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 140
Write 137
Mixed 86
SusWrite 73.3
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.6
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 56.6
71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 9,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $254

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,321
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 5700 $370Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback