Asrock X470 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181218
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 16:21
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
67.5% Good
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
79% 166 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 618
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 621
42% 621 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$407
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 409
Reflection 298
Parallax 792
107% 499 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 394
Splatting 360
105% 331 fps
Poor: 99%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$62
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 307 305 309 310 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 321
Mixed 312
SusWrite 307
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 36.4
138% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 241
208% 308 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$88
223GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2241 598 595 602 602 603 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,486
Write 2,191
Mixed 1,563
SusWrite 874
397% 1,778 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 77.7
250% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,010
DQ Write 651
DQ Mixed 840
624% 834 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 268%
Great: 324%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
465GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 573 626 627 636 637 638 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 781
Write 630
Mixed 666
SusWrite 623
152% 675 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 73.5
241% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 672
DQ Mixed 828
600% 779 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 178%
Great: 336%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$229
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 16 14 5.5 5.4 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 130
Write 124
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 14.8
65% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 86%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.2 4 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 20
Write 16.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.1
13% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 35.6
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 29
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X470 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 2,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback