Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 14:24
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 87.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 302
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,058
100% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,427
88% 1,427 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Gigabyte(1458 3FC5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.4% Very good
Lighting 97.3
Reflection 87
Parallax 80.7
79% 88.3 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 83.3
Splatting 72.3
68% 84.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 312 312 313 311 312 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 447
Mixed 376
SusWrite 326
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 54.3
186% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
SK hynix SC311 SATA 256GB
74GB free
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 242 233 235 234 235 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 438
Mixed 407
SusWrite 266
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 42.8
144% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 97%
SK hynix SC311 SATA 256GB
55GB free
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 251 190 168 148 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 467
Mixed 420
SusWrite 210
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 45.3
158% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 290
216% 285 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 97%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 50 45 65 22 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 2.5
SusWrite 54.7
20% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 1
167% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
Samsung G2 Portable 640GB
345GB free, PID 6034
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 37.2
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 40
48% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 20%
WD Elements 1TB
896GB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 64 45 50 44 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 59.4
111% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 34
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 34.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,196
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback