HP 870-204na

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP 870-204na (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 82F1
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161219
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '19 at 09:55
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	71%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 146 55% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 222 25% 195 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% HP(103C 82F5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.6% Average	Lighting 55.1 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 75.2 45% 65.4 fps	MRender 66.2 Gravity 53.6 Splatting 54.3 47% 58 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB 5,673 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 136 149 131 82 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 340 Write 151 Mixed 166 SusWrite 118 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 23.6 82% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 185 153% 227 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 118GB free Firmware: HPH3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 113 113 114 113 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 199 Write 176 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 112 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 112%
General UDisk 30GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 21GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	6.03% Terrible	Read 19 Write 3.3 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 7.9 9% 8.68 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.03% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB 5,828 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.5% Average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.3 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10.5 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-204na Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: HP 870-204na

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	11x

GPU
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	2x
RX 460AMD $90Bench 20%, 64,240 samples	1x

SSD
SD8SB8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 70%, 1,947 samples	6x
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	3x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	1x

RAM
4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 2x4GBMicronBench 63%, 3,242 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	1x
CT8G4DFD8213.16FA11 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 172 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $185

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16