Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 08:52
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 253
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 683
73% 581 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2006) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6793
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 128
Parallax 8.25
6% 47.8 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 16.3
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.19%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1960 2013 1910 2007 1233 1436 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,108
Write 1,613
Mixed 913
SusWrite 1,760
358% 1,598 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 81.6
266% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 1139
DQ Mixed 1,212
912% 1,221 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 329%
Great: 435%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 43 43 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 261
Write 32.7
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 42.5
94% 97 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 10.3
972% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 8.5
921% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 102%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 25
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback