Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '19 at 04:27
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 68.6 1-Core 150 2-Core 299 91% 173 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 1,176 105% 887 Pts	64-Core 2131 132% 2131 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.70 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 133 Reflection 146 Parallax 122 108% 134 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 128 Splatting 107 94% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 324 210 197 198 201 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 450 Mixed 383 SusWrite 263 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 95.4 4K Mixed 57.3 189% 65.2 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 136 108% 149 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 69GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 458 380 207 168 159 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 452 Mixed 393 SusWrite 305 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 96.6 4K Mixed 57.5 191% 66 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 131 109% 154 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 960GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 188 190 190 189 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 163 Mixed 77 SusWrite 188 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 108%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 142 140 141 141 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 68.5 Write 110 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 139 63% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.1 374% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 110%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 360GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 239 242 241 241 240 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 315GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 69 70 69 70 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 148 Write 116 Mixed 81 SusWrite 69.8 132% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.8 246% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 61%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 90GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 71 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 132 Write 125 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 71.5 121% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C15 4x8GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.6% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 26.1 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 26.5 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,640x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,409x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16