Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 00:38
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 623
65% 522 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Lighting 7.27
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 7.28
6% 26.1 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 6.57
Splatting 14.4
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2871302
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 417
Mixed 401
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 33.1
112% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 212
161% 223 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
95GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 413 415 417 416 403 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 422
Mixed 425
SusWrite 412
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 45.5
145% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 254
189% 256 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
WD My Passport 25E4 2TB
845GB free, PID 25e4
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 92 92 92 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 142
Write 116
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 91.8
132% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
163% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 25.9
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.6
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback