Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire TC-780 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171012
Uptime	7.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '19 at 14:58
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 91 1-Core 110 2-Core 217 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 414 56% 417 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B 326B) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 3.78 3% 3.81 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 3.27 Splatting 5.13 4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GI 128GB 1,733 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK60B9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 71 62 61 64 28 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 113 Write 287 Mixed 315 SusWrite 69.7 45% 196 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 89 4K Mixed 31.6 141% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 117 126% 208 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 78%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 183 185 184 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 179 Mixed 22 SusWrite 184 102% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1TB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 95 96 96 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 90.5 Write 94.5 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 96 106% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GB 7,235 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 12 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.9 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	866x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	232x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	192x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	328x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	174x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	161x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	38x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	32x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	32x

RAM
ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 2,540 samples	87x
AM2P24HC4U1-B9QS AM2P24HC8T1-BUSS 12GBAdataBench 56%, 513 samples	69x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 7,235 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16