Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3-$300 297 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 222 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 590 60% 487 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 21.1 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 19.4 17% 19 fps	MRender 23.6 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 16.3 17% 21 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 142 143 144 141 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 173 Write 191 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 137 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 2.7 463% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 1x8GB 5,321 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 10.3 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16