| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131112 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 20 '19 at 02:54 |
| Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 96% |
PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Extreme |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.9%
Below average
|
41% 85.8 Pts
|
32% 248 Pts
|
4% 60.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3747) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
|
25.8%
Poor
|
25% 81.5 fps
|
26% 78.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 40 29 34 43 57 MB/s
|
29.8%
Poor
|
17% 75.9 MB/s
|
63% 18.9 MB/s
|
24% 36.9 MB/s
|
|
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$69
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 74 69 61 70 MB/s
|
55.8%
Above average
|
66% 89.4 MB/s
|
168% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 28 MB/s
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
19% 25.1 MB/s
|
128% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
30.1%
Below average
|
34% 11.7 GB/s
|
2% 0.8 GB/s
|
44% 91.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 18,498 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 42%, 174,825 samples | 5,204x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 49%, 247,167 samples | 3,310x |
| FX-8320AMD $163Bench 44%, 91,262 samples | 1,503x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 463,263 samples | 1,365x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 0%, 13,972 samples | 1,182x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $110Bench 19%, 178,719 samples | 1,166x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $368 |