Gigabyte GA-Z87MX-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z87MX-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87MX-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130516
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '19 at 11:32
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$127 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 91.1 2-Core 208 69% 125 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 403 54% 402 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61% Good	Lighting 75.3 Reflection 79.5 Parallax 69 61% 74.6 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 74.3 60% 73.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB 2,100 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 215 249 234 238 245 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 436 Write 430 Mixed 348 SusWrite 234 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 38.1 135% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 227 201% 301 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 130GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 34 48 62 147 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 0.5 Write 31 Mixed 1 SusWrite 76.6 20% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3 1600 2x4GB 3,616 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 13.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87MX-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87MX-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	41x
Core i5-4670KIntel $127Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	28x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	14x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	23x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	14x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	7x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 32GBUnknownBench 60%, 20 samples	9x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16