Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20HKCTO1WW (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20HKCTO1WW
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '19 at 01:28
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 4,124 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 63.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 214 70% 128 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 577 59% 474 Pts	64-Core 586 36% 586 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro P3000 1,198 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Legend(17AA 224C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.2% Average	Lighting 48.7 Reflection 48.3 Parallax 42.6 40% 46.6 fps	MRender 58.2 Gravity 44.5 Splatting 49.4 41% 50.7 fps
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 42%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3791) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.7% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 122 Parallax 121 94% 119 fps	MRender 98.2 Gravity 117 Splatting 98.5 85% 105 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 110%
Intel HD Graphics P630 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 224C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7106 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.67% Terrible	Lighting 6.17 Reflection 80.8 Parallax 6.59 5% 31.2 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 5.57 Splatting 12.2 7% 7.91 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.67% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,873 Write 1,397 Mixed 825 301% 1,365 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 64.6 221% 78.3 MB/s	DQ Read 822 DQ Write 859 DQ Mixed 815 620% 832 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB 28,774 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 423GB free Firmware: 05.01A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 140 143 142 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 142 Write 139 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 141 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 82%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 89 97 94 85 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 14 Write 1.8 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 94.7 28% 37 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.9 358% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB 668 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 9 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

GPU
Quadro P3000NvidiaBench 40%, 1,198 samples	30x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 54%, 598 samples	28x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	25x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 239%, 34,988 samples	20x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	16x
MZVLW1T0HMLH-000L7 1TBSamsungBench 210%, 1,393 samples	11x

RAM
M474A2K43BB1-CRC Kingston 9965657-014.A00G Kingston 9965657-011.A00G Kingston 9965657-014.A00G 64GBSamsungBench 77%, 21 samples	11x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBHynixBench 73%, 6,356 samples	11x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 4x16GBSamsungBench 75%, 447 samples	7x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16