PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130712 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '19 at 22:46 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
27.9%
Poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 32 26 38 18 20 MB/s
|
||||
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
19GB free
Firmware: FH100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 56 58 52 41 77 MB/s
|
43.8%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB
831GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 69 71 63 52 100 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16
50GB free
Firmware: 0002BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 36 39 36 30 49 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD25 00BEVT-80A23T0 250GB
47GB free, PID 0571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.9 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.1 MB/s
|
6.84%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL9 4GB 0616 DDR3-1600 CL9 4GB 0616 DDR3-1333 CL9 4GB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
51.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 458x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 199x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 174x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 118x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 88x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 73x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $492 |