Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 1,588 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 139 57% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 240 31% 233 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.2 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.5% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 38.3 Parallax 35.2 31% 37.3 fps	MRender 47.6 Gravity 35 Splatting 36.3 32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN15ABHA 512GB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6T3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 306 333 339 341 337 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 363 Write 346 Mixed 282 SusWrite 318 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 25.1 82% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 112 132% 228 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 613GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 116 115 109 108 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 74.2 Write 95.7 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 112 62% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 109%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 59GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 77 81 84 86 83 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.8% Average	Read 144 Write 82.3 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 78.4 121% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.3 79% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 4x16GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.8% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 20.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 16.7 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 125%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	739x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	183x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16