Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2123 2,702 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 78.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 246 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 657 68% 550 Pts	64-Core 650 40% 650 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 950GB 636 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 469GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 117 92 115 96 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 127 Write 93.2 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 106 71% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 142%
USB DISK 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 0GB free, PID b155 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 30.4 Write 6.2 Mixed 8 14% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 30% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6E1 2x31.5GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 8 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	62.5% Good	MC Read 20 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 18.4 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 11 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	368x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	345x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	327x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	271x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	218x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	87x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16