Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '19 at 19:23
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 215
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 669
65% 536 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 140
Parallax 128
101% 131 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 127
Splatting 104
93% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
733GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 446 431 437 430 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 430
Mixed 402
SusWrite 438
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 46.3
158% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Kingston HyperX 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: 332ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 103 98 78 69 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 348
Write 122
Mixed 176
SusWrite 86.7
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 31.6
128% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 142
110% 152 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
71GB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 125 112 88 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 128
Write 130
Mixed 26
SusWrite 116
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 2200 MHz clocked @ 2333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 22.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $472
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback