Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180920
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '19 at 19:03
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 90 1-Core 117 2-Core 234 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 466 62% 467 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% XFX(1682 7240) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.79% Terrible	Lighting 7.67 Reflection 9 Parallax 9.16 6% 8.61 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 11.1 8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.79% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-GEN09SM19EG120GB 120GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 148 127 92 59 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 447 Write 384 Mixed 381 SusWrite 151 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 28.2 142% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 1.1 70% 164 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 80%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30 12,971 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 75GB free Firmware: CC2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 94 95 94 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 82.5 Write 86.5 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 94.4 57% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 65%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 6544, Toshiba Trans Memory Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3 4.1 3.8 3.6 3.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	7.12% Terrible	Read 33.9 Write 3.5 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 3.6 12% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.12% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial STK4U2400D17042C 1x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 12.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 15 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M DS2 2.0 Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	258x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	214x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	91x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	74x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	59x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	54x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	32x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	24x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	26x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	21x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $249

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16