PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-USB3V (all builds) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140304 |
Uptime | 3 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '19 at 13:50 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3340 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
67.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
1.63%
Terrible
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 71 50 77 32 40 MB/s
|
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
148GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 40 52 52 36 MB/s
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
22GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 35 23 13 12 9.8 MB/s
|
9.17%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
KETECH 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 29x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 22x |
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |