Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory43.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150612
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 18 '19 at 07:10
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5960X-$515
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.7% Good
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 187
66% 141 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 612
59% 472 Pts
64-Core 981
66% 981 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$480
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.6% Good
Lighting 262
Reflection 221
Parallax 244
67% 242 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 226
Splatting 154
57% 175 fps
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 270 139 125 117 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 440
Write 414
Mixed 328
SusWrite 193
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 44.2
148% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 270
203% 271 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 135%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$69
206GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 98.8
Write 95.5
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 58.7
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB
896GB free
Firmware: MPAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 115 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 122
Write 123
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 114
69% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60
280GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 71.1
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 87%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$208
6TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 170 164 174 175 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 139
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 167
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1
283% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$270
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 39.8
116% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 19.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 131%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $981
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $137Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 5700 $370Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback