QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive21.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory30GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 30GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory18.9 GB free of 30 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime40.8 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 07:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 38.4
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 111
39% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 420
35% 303 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 75%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 859GB
620GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 107 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.4% Poor
Read 235
Write 239
Mixed 121
SusWrite 108
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 4.9
17% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 30GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 14336 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 20.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 0.5
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback