Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 06:40
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 60.2
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 239
57% 114 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 692
73% 585 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
EVGA(3842 6367) 3GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 57.3
56% 64.6 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 67.4
55% 67 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 476 315 314 316 316 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,012
Write 961
Mixed 536
SusWrite 474
167% 746 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 43.8
196% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 1,151
DQ Mixed 708
644% 977 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 177%
Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
143GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 650 335 337 335 329 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,303
Write 1,243
Mixed 919
SusWrite 387
215% 963 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 67.6
236% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 1,323
DQ Mixed 998
791% 1,085 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 199%
Great: 280%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
57GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 29 23 23 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 143
Write 61
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 36
90% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.6
142% 3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S Builds (Compare 1,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $457
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback